<oai_dc:dc xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
        <dc:relation>1.	Бернс Р. Что такое Я-концепция. Развитие Я-концепции и воспитание.  Москва : «Прогресс», 1986. 320 с. &#13;
2.	Бороздина Л. В. Сущность самооценки и ее соотношение с Я-концепцией. Вестник Московского университета. Серия 14. Психология. 2011. № 1. С. 54–65.&#13;
3.	Гарднер Г. Структура разума: теория множественного интеллекта. Москва : Вильямс, 2007. 512 с.&#13;
4.	Мазяр О. В. Проблема обдарованості: субособистісний підхід. Актуальні проблеми психології : збірник наукових праць Інституту психології імені Г. С. Костюка НАПН України. Київ-Житомир : Вид-во ЖДУ ім. І. Франка, 2017. Т. VІI. Вип. 13. С. 87–94.&#13;
5.	Марцинковская Т. Д. «Образ Я» в современном мире: константы и трансформации. Мир психологии. 2009. № 4. С. 142–149. &#13;
6.	Радина Н. К., Терещенкова Е. Ю. Личностный опросник С. Хартер – психодиагностический инструмент нового поколения для изучения персональной идентичности подростка. Психология и школа. 2006. № 4. С. 3–20.&#13;
7.	Теплов Б. М. Способности и одарённость. Психология индивидуальных различий. Тексты. Москва : Изд-во Моск. Ун-та, 1982. 136 с.&#13;
8.	Цой А. Б. Самооценки интеллекта и их влияние на социально-психологическую адаптацию учащихся. Теоретическая и экспериментальная психология. 2012. Т. 5. № 1. С. 14–25. &#13;
9.	Щебланова Е. И. Психологическая диагностика одаренности школьников: проблемы, методы, результаты исследований и практики. Москва : Изд-во МПСИ; Воронеж : НПО «МОДЭК», 2004. 368 с.&#13;
10.	Щебланова Е. И., Петрова С. О. Общая и академическая я-концепции одаренных учащихся средней школы. Психологические исследования. 2014.  Т. 7. № 38. С. 7. URL: http://psystudy.ru/index.php/num/2014v7n38/1066-shcheblanova38.html (дата обращения: 30.11.2016). &#13;
11.	Campbell L., Campbell B., Dickinson D. Teaching and learning through multiple intelligences. (3rd ed.). Boston : Allyn &amp; Bacon, 2003. 368 p. &#13;
12.	Chan D. W. Perceived multiple intelligences among male and female Chinese gifted students in Hong Kong: the structure of the student multiple intelligences profile.  Gifted Child Quarterly. 2006. Vol. 50. No. 4. P. 325–338. &#13;
13.	Campbell D. T. Natural selection as an epistemological model». A handbook of method in cultural anthropology / R. Naroll, R. Cohen (Eds.). New York : National History Press.  P. 51–85.&#13;
14.	Conceptions of giftedness / Sternberg R. J., Davidson J. E. (Eds.) ; 2nd ed.  Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2005. 467 р.&#13;
15.	Dai D. Y., Swanson J. A., Cheng H. State of research on giftedness and gifted education: a survey of empirical studies published during 1998–2010 (April). Gifted Child Quarterly. 2011. Vol. 55. No. 2. P. 126–138. &#13;
16.	Feldhusen J. F. Giftedness, talent, expertise, and creative achievement.  Conceptions of Giftedness / R. J. Sternberg, J. E. Davidson (Eds.). New York : Cambridge University Press, 2005. Р. 64–79. &#13;
17.	Freeman J. Gifted lives: what happens when gifted children grow up? London ; New York : Routledge, 2010. 328 р.&#13;
18.	Furnham A., Arteche A., Chamorro-Premuzic T., Keser A., Swami V. Self- and other-estimates of multiple abilities in Britain and Turkey: A cross-cultural comparison of subjective ratings of intelligence. International Journal of Psychology. 2009. Vol. 44. No. 6. P. 434–442. &#13;
19.	Furnham A., Shagabutdinova K. Sex differences in estimating multiple intelligences in self and others: A replication in Russia. International Journal of Psychology. 2012. Vol. 47. No. 6. P. 448–459. &#13;
20.	Gagné F. From gifts to talents: the DMGT as a developmental model. Conceptions of Giftedness / R. J. Sternberg, J. E. Davidson (Eds.). Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2005. P. 98–120. &#13;
21.	Harter S. Susan Harter self-report instruments. The University of Denver Portfolio, 2012. URL: https://portfolio.du.edu/SusanHarter/page/44210. &#13;
22.	Hoge R. D., Renzulli J. S. Self-concept and the gifted child. The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented. The University of Connecticut, 1991. – 57 p. &#13;
23.	Kosir K., Horvat M., Aram U., Jurinec N. Is being gifted always an advantage? Peer relations and self-concept of gifted students. High Ability Studies. 2016. Vol. 27. No. 2. P. 129–148. &#13;
24.	Munich studies of giftedness / Heller K. A. (Ed.). Berlin : LIT Verlag Dr. W. Hopf, 2010. P. 92–101.&#13;
25.	Neto F., Ruiz F., Furnham A. Sex differences in self-estimation of multiple intelligences among Portuguese adolescents. High Ability Studies. 2008. Vol. 19.  No. 2. P. 189–204. &#13;
26.	Reis S. M. Is this really still a problem? The special needs of gifted girls and women. Fundamentals of Gifted Education: Considering Multiple Perspectives / C. M. Callahan, H. L. Hertberg-Davis (Eds.). New York : Routledge, 2013. Р. 343–357. &#13;
27.	Renzulli J. S. Reexamining the role of gifted education and talent development for the 21st Century: A four-part theoretical approach. Gifted Child Quarterly. 2012.  Vol. 56. No. 3. P. 150–159. &#13;
28.	Rinn A. N., Jamieson K. M., Gross C. M., McQueen K. S. A canonical correlation analysis of the influence of social comparison, gender, and grade level on the multidimensional self-concepts of gifted adolescents. Social Psychology Education: An International Journal. 2009. Vol. 12. No. 2. P. 251–269. &#13;
29.	Rudasill K. M., Capper M. R., Foust R. C., Callahan C. M., Albaugh S. B. Grade and gender differences in gifted students’ self-concepts. Journal for the Education of the Gifted. 2009. Vol. 32. No. 3. P. 340–367. &#13;
30.	Shani-Zinovich I., Zeidner M. The elusive search for the personality of the intellectually gifted student: some cross-cultural findings and conclusions from the Israeli educational context. Talent Development &amp; Excellence. 2013. Vol. 5. No. 2. P. 13–22.&#13;
31.	Syzmanowicz A., Furnham A. Gender differences in self-estimates of general, mathematical, spatial and verbal intelligence: four meta analyses. Learning and Individual Differences. 2011. Vol. 21. No. 5. P. 493–504. &#13;
32.	Subotnik R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius P., Worrell F. C. Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: a Proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest. 2011. Vol. 12. No. 1. P. 3–54.&#13;
33.	The social and emotional development of gifted children: what do we know? / M. Neihart, S. Pfeiffer, T. L. Cross (Eds.) ; 2nd edition. Waco : Prufrock Press, 2015. 312 p. &#13;
34.	Tirri K., Nokelainen P. Identification of multiple intelligences with the multiple intelligence profiling questionnaire III. Psychology Science Quarterly. 2008. Vol. 50. No. 2. P. 206–221.&#13;
35.	Villatte A., Hugon M., de Léonardis M. Forms of self-concept in gifted high school students enrolled in heterogeneous classes. European Journal of Psychology of Education. 2011. Vol. 26. No. 3. P. 373–392.&#13;
36.	Visser B. A., Ashton M. C., Vernon Ph. A. What makes you think you’re so smart? Measured abilities, personality, and sex differences in relation to self-estimates of multiple intelligences. Journal of Individual Differences. 2008. Vol. 29. No. 1. P. 35–44.</dc:relation></oai_dc:dc>