eprintid: 42707
rev_number: 21
eprint_status: archive
userid: 8984
dir: disk0/00/04/27/07
datestamp: 2025-02-12 13:22:13
lastmod: 2025-02-12 13:31:25
status_changed: 2025-02-12 13:22:13
type: article
metadata_visibility: show
title: An interdisciplinary approach to education will help solve many of its urgent problems
language: english
keywords: interdisciplinary approach; continuous/lifelong education; fundamentalization approach in education; general systems theory; fundamental explanatory models; phenomenon of “half-life” of specialist’s competencies; conceptual thinking; fractal organization of reality
creators_name: Вознюк, О. В.
creators_id: alexvoz@ukr.net
ispublished: pub
subjects: B1
subjects: BC
subjects: BF
subjects: L1
subjects: Q1
subjects: QA
divisions: pedangl
full_text_status: public
date: 2025
date_type: published
publication: Forum for Education Studies
volume: 3
number: 1
pagerange: 1-32
id_number: https://doi.org/10.59400/fes1948
refereed: TRUE
issn: 3029-2956
referencetext: 1.	Epstein D. Range: Why Generalists Triumph in a Specialized World. Riverheads Books; 2019.
2.	Ball, SJ. Global trends in educational reform and the struggle for the soul of teacher! In: Proceedings of the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference; 2–5 September 1999; Brighton, UK. pp. 18.
3.	Berg I. Education and Job: The Great Training Robbery. Beacon Press; 1971.
4.	Farber BA. Crisis in Education: Stress and Burnout in the American Teacher. Jossey-Bass; 1991.
5.	Voznyuk А. Trends in the development of world education. A collection of abstracts of reports of the scientific conference of teachers and young scientists of Zhytomyr Ivan Franko State University. 2023; pp. 12–21.
6.	Dunning D, Johnson K, Ehrlinger J, et al. Why people fail to recognize their own incompetence. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2003; 12(3): 83–87. doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.01235
7.	Barsalou LW, Dutriaux L, Scheepers C. Moving beyond the distinction between concrete and abstract concepts. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2018; 373(1752): 20170144. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0144
8.	Voznyuk О, Gogobets S. (2023) The formation of conceptual thinking in the participants in the educational process: A systemic approach. Zhytomyr Ivan Franko State University Journal. Pedagogical Sciences. 2023; 4(115): 50–64.
9.	Ziegler R, Weger U. Exploring conceptual thinking and pure concepts from a first person perspective. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences. 2019; 18(5): 947–972. doi: 10.1007/s11097-018-9593-8
10.	Versaci R. How Comic Books Can Change the Way Our Students See Literature: One Teacher’s Perspective. The English Journal. 2001; 91(2): 61. doi: 10.2307/822347
11.	Fodor J. Some reflections on L.S. Vygotsky’s thought and language. Cognition. 1972; 1(1), 83–95. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(72)90046-7
12.	Oppenheimer T. The Flickering Mind: Saving Education from the False Promise of Technology. Random House; 2004.
13.	Goffman E. Frame analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Northern University Press; 1986.
14.	Minsky M. A Framework for Representing Knowledge. In: Winston P (editor). The Psychology of Computer Vision. McGraw-Hill; 1975. pp. 211–277.
15.	Smirnova O, Rackevičienė S, Mockienė L . Frame semantics methodology for teaching terminology of specialized domains. Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes. 2021; 9(4): 765–773. doi: 10.22190/jtesap2104765s
16.	Schank RC, Abelson RP. Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding. An Inquiry Into Human Knowledge Structures. Psychology Press; 2013.
17.	Grindal BT. The Idea of Synergy and It’s Bearing on An Anthropological Humanism. Anthropology and Humanism Quarterly. 2009; 1(3): 4–6.
18.	Urmantsev YA. Symmetry of System and System of Symmetry. Computers & Mathematics with Applications. 1986; 12(1–2): 1986, 379–405.
19.	Nikitina YI, Konyushenko SM, Kuzina EA, et al. Fundamentalization and Professionalization of Learning Content under the Competence Approach. Journal of Sustainable Development. 2015; 8(3). doi: 10.5539/jsd.v8n3p155
20.	Rudyshyn SD, Kravets VP, Samilyk VI, et al. Features of the Fundamentalization of Education in Higher Educational Institutions of Ukraine in the Context of Sustainable Development. Journal of Educational and Social Research. 2020; 10(6): 149. doi: 10.36941/jesr-2020-0116
21.	Klentsev ES, Muschanov VF. Unity of thematic and methodological content of the fundamental discipline. Theory and Methods of Learning Fundamental Disciplines in High School. 2003; 1(1): 103–110.
22.	Amunts K. Structural indices of asymmetry. In: The Two Halves of the Brain. The MIT Press; 2010. pp. 145–176.
23.	Dobinson GH. Fundamental education. British Journal of Educational Studies. 1953; 1(2): 121–130. doi: 10.1080/00071005.1953.9972894
24.	Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist. 2000; 55(1): 68–78. doi: 10.1037/0003-066x.55.1.68
25.	Rodrigues JB. The genera and species of new orchids he collected, described and illustrated with icons…(Latin). In: Genera Et Species Orchidearum Novarum. Sebastianopolis ; 1956.
26.	Styron RA. Interdisciplinary Education: A Reflection of the Real World. Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics. 2013; 11(9): 47–52.
27.	Morgun VF. Intedification of education: Psychological and pedagogical foundations of integration and differentiation (intedification) of education, for example, in the school cycle of natural sciences. Poltava: Scientific Change. 1996.
28.	Vozniuk OV. Universal matrixes of knowledge as interdisciplinary instruments of scientific research and students’ teaching means. Zhytomyr Ivan Franko State University Journal. 2018; 2(93): 5–12.
29.	Vozniuk OV, Dubaseniuk OA. To the question of building the universal model of the development of world pedagogy and education. Zhytomyr Ivan Franko State University Journal. Pedagogical Sciences. 2020; 1(100): 5–14.
30.	Voznyuk A. Universal matrixes of knowledge as an important educational resource. In: Proceedings of the 1st Virtual International Conference on Sustainable Education SEVIC 2020 (sevic.org); 11–13 December 2020; Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine.
31.	Bullmore E, Brammer M, Harvey I, et al. Cerebral hemispheric asymmetry revisited: Effects of handedness, gender and schizophrenia measured by radius of gyration in magnetic resonance images. Psychological Medicine. 1995; 25(2): 349–363. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700036254
32.	Charman DK. The cerebral hemispheres appear to function differently in artists and scientists. Cortex. 1981; 17 (3): 453–458.
33.	Russel P. The Brain Book. Penguin Books; 1979.
34.	Springer SP, Deutsch G. Left Brain, Right Brain: Perspectives from Cognitive Neuroscience. Freeman; 1997.
35.	Wang B, Yang L, Yan W, et al. Brain asymmetry: a novel perspective on hemispheric network. Brain Science Advances. 2023; 9(2): 56–77. doi: 10.26599/bsa.2023.9050014
36.	Voznyuk A, Gorobets S, Kubitskyi S, et al. Interdisciplinary Educational Technology based on the Concept of Human Brain Functional Asymmetry. Postmodern Openings. 2021; 12(2). doi: 10.18662/po/12.2/316
37.	Sedgwick HA. J. J. Gibson’s “Ground Theory of Space Perception”. i-Perception. 2021; 12(3). doi: 10.1177/20416695211021111
38.	Murphy M. Donovan S. The physical and psychological effects of meditation. Esalen Institute: Study of Exceptional Functioning; 1988.
39.	Murphy M, Donovan S, Taylor E. The Physical and Psychological Effects of Meditation: A Review of Contemporary Research With a Comprehensive Bibliography. Inst of Noetic Sciences; 1997.
40.	Naan GI. The Symmetrical Universe. Publications de L’Observatoire Astronomique de l’Universite de Tartu. 1964; 34: 421–438.
41.	Voznyuk О. Deepening The Principles Of Media Education Based On The General Systems Theory. Zhytomyr Ivan Franko State University Journal. Pedagogical Sciences. 2023; 1(112): 29–38.
42.	Piaget J. The Psychology of Intelligence. Routledge and Kegan Paul; 1950.
43.	Voznyuk O, Dubaseyuk О. (2023): Research of The Category “Upbringing” By Means of Scientific Analysis. Zhytomyr Ivan Franko State University Journal. Pedagogical Sciences. 2023; 2 (113): 52–63.
44.	Kostyuk HS. Educational process and mental development of personality. Rad.shkola; 1989.
45.	Voznyuk AV. (2014) The main aspects of the universal paradigm of development: From the universe to a creatuve personality. Creative pedagogy. Scientific method. journal/Academy of International Cooperation in Creative Pedagogy. 2014; 8: 127–141.
46.	Shnoll SE. Cosmophysical Factors in Stochastic Processes. American Research Press; 2009.
47.	Atmanspacher H. The Pauli–Jung Conjecture and Its Relatives: A Formally Augmented Outline. Open Philosophy. 2020; 3(1): 527–549. doi: 10.1515/opphil-2020-0138
48.	Jung CG, Pauli WE. The Interpretation of Nature and the Psyche. Ishi Press; 2012.
49.	Atmanspacher H. The Pauli-Jung conjecture and its impact today. In: Atmanspacher H, Fuchs CA (editors). The Pauli-Jung conjecture and its impact today. Imprint Academic; 2014.
50.	Benedict R. Synergy: Patterns of the Good Culture. American Anthropologist. 1970; 72: 320–330.
51.	Maslow AH. The Farther Reaches of Human Nature. Penguin Books; 1976.
52.	Marien M. Book Review of Come On!: A Report to the Club of Rome: New Frontiers. CADMUS. 2018; 3(4): 57–68.
53.	Vaskivska H. Didactic aspects realization of interdisciplinary ties in process training students of highers pedagogical educational establishments. Educological discourse. 2017; 3–4. doi: 10.28925/2312-5829.2017.3-4.1374
citation:   Вознюк, О. В.  (2025) An interdisciplinary approach to education will help solve many of its urgent problems.  Forum for Education Studies, 3 (1).  с. 1-32.  ISSN 3029-2956     
document_url: http://eprints.zu.edu.ua/42707/1/1.pdf